Some of Our Cases
Here are a few cases handled by Bob and Robin in their legal careers:
318 East 93, LLC v. Ward, 276 AD2d 277 (2000)
Successfully defended, in Civil Court and in two appeals, a senior citizen
from eviction based upon the claim that her apartment was so messy that
she could not possibly live there.
Grassini v. Paravalos, 270 AD2d 52
Successfully asserted, in Supreme Court and on appeal, a tenant’s
claim to rent stabilized status.
Stowe v. 19 East 88th Street, Inc., 257 AD2d
355
Prevailed against a cooperative corporation that was refusing to permit
the transfer of an apartment to the next of kin of a deceased shareholder.
77 Avenue D Associates, Inc. v. DHCR, 249 AD2d
113
In this Article 78 proceeding brought by a landlord, we intervened on
behalf of the tenants to have a rent overcharge award by the DHCR sustained.
Hudson v. Benoit, 226 AD2d 196
Defended an appeal by a landlord after having the landlord’s eviction
case thrown out of the Civil Court.
227 East 57th Street Associates v. DHCR and
Beardsall, 214 AD2d 327
Successfully intervened in an Article 78 proceeding upholding a rent
reduction for a tenant, and defended the landlord’s appeal.
Schanzer v. Vendome, 7 Misc 3d 1018A
In this Civil Court proceeding, we established that it was proper to
bring the Department of Buildings into an HP proceeding to have serious
DOB violations corrected.
Cassorla v. Foster, 2 Misc2d 65
After winning a long trial where the architect landlord claimed that
his building was exempt from rent stabilization because of a “substantial
rehabilitation,” we prevailed against the landlord’s appeal.
Lipkis v. Gilmour, 160 Misc 2d 50
After the landlord of a loft building brought a non-payment eviction
case, the tenant raised a defense that the landlord had not complied
with the loft law. That defense was stricken by the Civil Court, but
was reversed, based on Bob’s legal arguments in the Appellate
Term.
Various Tenants of 446-448 West 167th Street
v. NYC Department of HPD, 153 Misc 2d 221
In a case brought by tenants in a city owned building against the City
of New York to obtain repairs, the City was held in contempt of court
for failing to comply with a court order requiring those repairs to
be done. The City appealed, but lost in the Appellate Term, and the
tenants were permitted to go ahead on their claims for damages and legal
fees.
Artis v. City of New York, 133 Misc 2d 629
Tenants were successful in having a 7A administrator appointed to run
a building that had been mismanaged by the City of New York.
Kace Realty Co. v. Levy, 130 Misc. 2d 858
Successfully defended a non-primary residence case in the Civil Court
and on appeal based upon the landlord’s non compliance with the
Rent Stabilization Law.
Toribio v. Whiz Realty Corp. 131 Misc 2d 227
After the tenants of a run down building were successful in having a
7A administrator appointed to run the building, a new owner purchased
it. That new owner sought to take the building back from the tenants,
but was barred from doing so based upon Bob’s demonstration that
the new landlord could not show financial ability nor a detailed plan
to put the building back into proper repair.
Melevoi v. Yang, 120 Misc 2d 982
Succeeded in having non-payment cases against a group of tenants dismissed
because of the landlord’s failure to comply with the rent regulatory
laws.
42-44 West 74th Street, LLC v. Savior
NewYork Law Journal 9/29/05
We had the landlord’s law firm disqualified because they had represented
the tenant in another matter, creating a conflict of interest.
Riverton v. Knibb, NYSlipOp 25552 AT1
12/28/05 xxcite
This decision is available online , and is notable in
that it reversed a controversial decision that was the subject of a
front page article in the New York Law Journal. The tenant asserted
succession rights, claiming that she was living in the apartment with
her grandmother at the time of her death. The landlord opposed the succession
rights because the tenant had signed her deceased grandmother’s
name on a renewal lease. The trial court agreed with the landlord. When
the tenant came to our firm, we obtained a reversal in the Appellate
Term.